Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
Nov 11, 2012 9:30am EST
to someonene other than the government. the answer to that is going to be becoming energy-independent. the problem with that is when the president talks about it, he means something very different than what republicans say when ththey talk about it. and dealing with china, which the president does not want to do. the republicansiew it as protectionist trade you h have assetsts of mplex probms which must be resolved, i d don't see much hope for that in t the next rounund. we will get a band-aid, the higher taxes that you despererately wt, -- -- yes - [laughte >> he likes to label. marion blakey, you know this town as much as anyone. none of these thingngs are right to happen anytime soon -- going to happen anytime soon. can i to say what my pet peeve is? >> pet pve of the ek. >> p pet peevef the e year, , mayb bruceepuyt. the cbcbo sayiying that if the deal is not reachched to oveome the deficit, real gdp would drop 0.5% in 2013, unemployment would ju to 9%. that is assuminthat no ta rates go up and d no spending g cuts -- >>isten to that -- >> way, i want to finisish myy
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1